GET INVOLVED!!!
Come strategize on how to support the Walkout
The War Room will be every Thursday
at the IKE BOX café in the BAY ROOM!
299 Cottage St, NE, Salem
one block from the Capital
Join us June 1
Learn lobbying, testifying and analyzing.
Legislative Speaker each week.
BILLS ARE STILL BEING MOVED THROUGH THE HOUSE, SO THIS IS OUR LAST OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD. EVEN IF YOU CAN’T ATTEND, CLICK ON A BILL # AND SUBMIT TESTIMONY ON ANY BILL SLATED FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
COMPLETE LIST OF BILLS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING OR WORK SESSION HERE.
If you haven’t already, this is an additional opportunity to let those in power know We The People hold them accountable.
THREE LETTERS YOU CAN SEND AS PART OF THE LEGISLATIVE COMPLAINT
[At the bottom is a suggested response for rejection.]
Senator Brian Boquist included samples in his Newsletter:
Last week’s special edition gave you the background of the corruption in the Oregon State Capitol. See special edition. We have received thousands of individualized contacts. You asked how do I file a legislative complaint? You asked who do I ask why the constitution, statute, and laws are being broken in the legislature? So below are contacts based on your questions. There are a few samples you can copy, edit, personalize, and email your complaint or question to the right person at their online publicly available email address. Be polite and professional.
Again, here is the link to last week’s special edition with the sources, references, floor letters and vote explanations regarding corruption in the Capitol. Link.
Sample
Subject: Official Misconduct Complaint (3-paragraphs)
Email addresses to: PClarkson@co.marion.or.us
Honorable DA Clarkson & Sheriff Kast
Marion County was quick to prosecute elected republicans in 2020-21 for official misconduct under ORS 162.405/415 at the request of Capitol Democrats in 2020. Republicans were not protected by the Oregon Constitution, yet, you do nothing today? There is no legislative immunity for criminal actions. Lawlessness reigns in the Oregon State Capitol today. The AG and OSP are fully compromised as contractors and representatives of the perpetrators. The media and official records display the flow of illegal drug and laundered cash to Governor Kotek, Secretary Fagan, Senator Wagner, Representative Rayfield, Representative Fahey and others in the Capitol. Even the Chief Justice knows certain Democrats were unconstitutionally sworn into the Legislature. We know you possess other citizen complaints as well, therefore, you are requested to conduct an investigation.
ORS 162.414 states it is crime when a public servant fails to perform a duty or performs an unauthorized act. Here is the starting list of alleged violations: Or Const Art II Sec 10 multiple lucrative offices, Or Const Art III Sec 1 separation of powers, Or Const Art IV Sec 8 residency, Or Const Art IV Sec 14 open deliberations, Or Const Art IV Sec 21 plain reading, Or Const Art IV Sec 25 passage of bills without majority, ORS 173,134 readability, ORS 173.135 outside counsel, ORS 244.040 confidential financial gain, ORS 244.020 pecuniary benefit detriment, ORS 164.170 money laundering, ORS 166.720 racketeering, ORS 166.065 harassment of legislators, ORS 163.190 menacing of legislators, Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyers promoting the aforementioned to cite a few. Floor letters and vote explanations in the Oregon Legislative Information System validate these complaints.
Respectfully request you investigate and prosecute given you are the elected officials responsible in the County of Precedence over the Oregon State Capitol.
Note. Copy yourself and share with others so they cannot deny receipt.
Sample
Subject: Unconstitutional Swearing In Question (1-paragraph)
To email addresses: ojd.info@ojd.state.or.us todd.sprague@ojd.state.or.us
To: Honorable Chief Justice Flynn
On January 9, 2023, the Chief Justice swore in multiple Democrat legislators in violation of Or Const Art II Sec 10 multiple lucrative offices, Or Const Art III Sec 1 separation of powers, and Or Const Art IV Sec 8 residency. Complaints were filed with President Wagner and Speaker Rayfield before the swearing in regarding Floyd Prozanski and Hai Pham. Mr. Prozanski’s own webpage, Orestar filings, and OGEC filings clearly admit he is a lucrative public prosecuting attorney in another branch of government. Was the Chief Justice hoodwinked by Democrat legislative leaders? Who in the Democrat legislature leadership confirmed unconstitutionally qualified electors were eligible? Were any legislative lawyers involved in misleading the Chief Justice? Does the Chief Justice have any recourse to being mislead or lied to by Democrat legislative leadership? We respectfully request to know how this happened as Or Const Art IV Sec 25 which requires sixteen votes in the Oregon State Senate for bill passage is being routinely violated now. Yet the Oregon Supreme Court which swore in ineligible legislators is responsible even if hoodwinked by Democrats in the legislature or the now disgraced Secretary of State. We respectfully request answers from our elected Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court on these matters.
Note. Copy yourself and share with others so you have proof of your questions.
Sample
Subject: Constitutional Legislative Complaint (3-parapgraphs)
To email addresses: Sen.RobWagner@
Email copy to Conduct Committee Co Chair: Sen.DickAnderson@
To: Senate President Wagner & Secretary Brocker
The Oregon Constitution makes the Oregon State Senate the judge of itself except in criminal matters. We are aware criminal complaints have been filed regarding corruption in the State Capitol. This is a formal complaint that even your Legislative Counsel has opinioned this type complaint must be investigated under Senate & Mason’s Rules procedures. The complaint includes both of you, your legal counsel, your majority leader, and unconstitutionally seated judiciary committee chair.
On January 6, 2023, formal complaints documented in OLIS were filed regarding the unconstitutional seating of the judiciary chair but Democrats have stonewalled this complaint to personal and/or political gain in violation of the law. Further violations include but are not limited to Or Const Art II Sec 10 multiple lucrative offices, Or Const Art III Sec 1 separation of powers, Or Const Art IV Sec 14 open deliberations, Or Const Art IV Sec 21 plain reading, Or Const Art IV Sec 25 passage of bills without majority, ORS 173,134 readability, ORS 173.135 outside counsel, ORS 244.040 confidential financial gain, Senate Rule violations, Mason’s Rules, and Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyers promoting the aforementioned to cite a few. Floor letters and vote explanations in the Oregon Legislative Information System validate these complaints.
All Democrat legislators, their lawyers, employees, and committee staff need to recuse themselves per the law and rules for an independent investigation of these constitutional and statutory complaints. All actions and bills that violate the Oregon Constitution must be held in abeyance until these complaints are resolved. This is a formal complaint under Or Const Art I Sec 26 giving instructions and demanding redress as your own Chief Legislative Counsel has outlined in writing. Respectfully submitted.
Note. Copy yourself and share with others so the recipients cannot deny receipt of your complaint.
This is a link to the Citizens Complaint Guide V4 that was in previous clips. It has samples, points of contract, senator email addresses, and email addresses to editors and reporters. Link again.
Closing Comments
Hope this information you requested on how to file complaints was helpful. Remember, almost all the contacts are elected officials so do not take ‘no’ for an answer. Push back as the Democrat establishment will try to protect four decades of Democrat government. Again, be polite and professional. Next week we will provide more examples of complaint processes to other authorities you have requested of us.
Last clips comment. Rural citizen legislators elected to represent rural districts took an oath to uphold the constitution and rule of law. You can expect they will do it unlike most Senate Democrats along with their campaign donors already convicted in federal court. Rural legislators are attending committees working on the final day’s legislation for the biennium. The state is fully funded by a continuing budget resolution until September 2023. Remember, it was Tina Kotek, the present Governor, who gaveled out of the House and ran away on the last days of 2020 Session not rural legislators. The same Tina Kotek who took $68,000 in drug cash donations plus laundered FTX donations per the media and state reports. Now Governor Kotek who is protected by the AG.
Remember, government serves government not the People. The People’s representatives legislate not public employee unions and special interests including drug dealers and money launderers. You must act if you want freedom. Your choice.
Be safe. Be neighborly. Be prepared.
De oppresso liber!
Sincerely,
Brian Boquist
Oregon State Senator
________
RESPONSE TO REJECTION BASED ON RULE 27:
Counsel,
Thank you for accepting my conduct report under HCR 28 LBPR 27 (11). You stated, you do not believe my complaint is the type of complaint you are able to review under Rule 27. However, Rule 27(11) allows me, “observes behavior that is inconsistent with this rule may make a nonconfidential report of the behavior…A report made under this subsection shall be referred to as a conduct report.” Being within my rights to file a conduct report, I would appreciate reporting it as a nonconfidential conduct report.
Senator Weber and rural legislators filed legal action against the President and Secretary that is in Circuit Court now. Rural Senators have filed numerous constitutional and statutory complaints against the President and Secretary that are in floor letters and voted explanations in the Senate Journal dating to January 2023. LBPR 27 (3)(J)(K) defines these rural legislators as whistleblowers and refusing to perform unlawful acts.
Further, some have been denied medical absences under LBPR 27 (3)(L) while Democrats are given excuses. Some have been refused religious accommodation LBPR 27 (3)(F) granted for over 160 years while others are not. All of this is in the senate record.
Based on media broadcasts and senate floor observations, any reasonable person would conclude the actions of the Senate President and Secretary constitute retaliation against rural legislators contrary to the policy and prohibitions outlined in Section (1) and Section (8) of LBPR 27.
Again, having observed these events I submitted this conduct report which you are requested to retain through the five years statute of limitations.
Sincerely,
Date: 2023-05-30 04:52
No tags for this post.